Me Thinks

Friday, March 03, 2006

Continued....Bush Swagatham

Since some of you had asked for T.P.Sreenivasan's entire article in Asian Wall Street Journal, I thought I'd post it here.

Welcome to India, Mr. President
By T.P. SREENIVASAN
Mr. Sreenivasan served as deputy Indian ambassador in Washington from 1997
to 2000. See http://www.TPSreenivasan.com

Dear Mr. President,

One capital in the world where you are sure to be welcomed with garlands is
New Delhi. Your predecessors, former U.S. Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill
Clinton were extremely well-received here, even though they never offered
nearly as much promise for India-U.S. relations. Our parliamentarians
jostled each other to shake hands with Mr. Clinton, even after he chastised
us for our nuclear tests on the floor of our own Parliament in 2000.

As a democracy that has survived unscathed for nearly 60 years, we have a
romantic ideal of the American Democratic Party. But we also know that it is
the Republican presidents who have discovered our potential and acted
accordingly. Since former U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower gave us the Atoms
for Peace initiative, where a number of Indian scientists were invited to
the U.S. for training in peaceful uses of nuclear energy, the only U.S.
president who has recognized our crying need for nuclear energy and shown
readiness to end our nuclear isolation is you, George W. Bush.

Our strenuous efforts, for nearly 50 years, to secure nuclear technology
without signing the nonproliferation treaty bore fruit on July 18, 2005,
when you agreed with our Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that India should
have the same rights and obligations as other nuclear-weapon states, such as
the United States. By that single gesture, you earned a permanent place in
our hearts. When we were told that you would deliver on those promises
during your visit this week, our excitement reached a crescendo.

Now, it looks as if when you arrive in India today, you will come
empty-handed. The high priests of nonproliferation in your country perceived
a grave danger in providing uranium fuel to our starving nuclear-power
stations. After the July agreement was signed, your State Department shifted
the goalposts to address those concerns, by asking New Delhi to submit a
plan for separation of civilian and military facilities to be approved by
the U.S. No other nuclear-weapon state has such an obligation. The
subsequent inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency of Indian
civilian facilities are sought by the State Department to be perpetual. In
other words, the balance of rights and obligations of the July 2005
agreement has fallen victim to past prejudices. U.S. lawmakers have not
shown any signs of a change of heart.

A change of heart is slow in coming in India as well. Many here, including
scientists, believe that your motivation is to drag India into the
nonproliferation tent and to stop the development of a uranium alternative
for fuelling our power plants. They see a conspiracy behind the U.S. offer
to break the nuclear impasse. They would rather keep reinventing the wheel
in splendid isolation rather than accept the challenges of international
cooperation. Sixty years of suspicion can not be wiped out in a day.

The success of your visit to India is not contingent upon the implementation
of a nuclear deal. More important is a demonstration of a new mindset in
both Washington and New Delhi. If the United States is committed to the
emergence of India as a great power, there is no better way to show it than
by supporting New Delhi's aspiration for permanent membership of the United
Nations Security Council. No one expects an immediate consensus on an
expansion of the Security Council, but an indication of U.S. support is long
overdue. Equally important is the need to rectify the anachronism of India's
absence from Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.

The way forward is to pursue the path that you and our prime minister
embarked upon in July of last year. Any attempt to modify it is dangerous.
Both sides must realize that cooperation is possible even after years of
estrangement, and that it will benefit both sides.

No other visit by a head of state to India has generated as much interest
and controversy as your own. You will see the vibrancy of our democracy and
the enormity of our challenges. You will also witness a universal regard for
America's accomplishments. Welcome to India.

7 Comments:

Blogger thennavan said...

Good article. I am reminded of former US ambassador Robert Blackwill's farewell speech on India "What India Means To Me" (and anyone reading it will swell with pride at a foreigner's understanding of our country and tradition in such a short span of time :-)

11:03 PM  
Blogger Deepa said...

True Mukundan, its even more praise-worthy coming from him, a non-Indian. Thanks for the link.

11:12 AM  
Blogger I said...

The United Nations is a big waste of money and space. It is an irrelevant organization. The US may support India and Japan for a permanent seat in the Security Council, only to make sure that the balance of power is maintained, even there. But it is completely useless for India.

Remember, a nuclear arrangement with India without the NPT will be like a "India specific" nuclear policy. Though it is the right thing, it'll contradict 60 years of consistency and established rules. Bush can't change it so easily, though he may want to. Yes, there will be a lengthy debate in Congress. But eventually, Bush will try very hard for a "India specific" nuclear policy. Not coz he "recognizes India's energy needs" but coz to decrease Indian dependence on Middle Eastern- specifically Iranian- gas/oil. India is also the best bet to contain China regionally and warn pakistan of its radical leanings. For the first possible time ever, the US has recognized India as a strategic and organic ally. Bush has broken ground with his predecessor's pakistan-centric foreign policy in S.Asia. Not that it's wrong but post-9/11, u gotta look at the bigger picture. It was not easy for him and he needs to be given credit for it.

Indians need to understand something. All the world simply does not look through the prism of India. Bush is first, the President of the United States. Not the deputy Prime Minister of India, even though he's the most pro-Indian American president.

11:16 AM  
Blogger TPS said...

I am glad to see that you have reproduced my article in your blog.
Thanks.
T.P.Sreenivasan
tpsreenivasan@gmail.com

8:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. Audi car computer Car accessories for chrysler 300m Dash mount radar detectors klonopin side effects http://www.romance-perfume.info/Depakote_caffine_alcohol.html Logan renault france supply chain Dog pain relievers 2006 audi s4 avant Surveys on hair loss products Eaglescliffe golf club Solid wood file cabinet avis car rental

5:53 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very nice site! film editing schools

4:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep up the good work » »

1:01 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home